Anthropic says the change was motivated by a "collective action problem" stemming from the competitive AI landscape and the US's anti-regulatory approach. "If one AI developer paused development to implement safety measures while others moved forward training and deploying AI systems without strong mitigations, that could result in a world that is less safe," the new RSP reads. "The developers with the weakest protections would set the pace, and responsible developers would lose their ability to do safety research and advance the public benefit."
This one was a lot better than others. For every SAT problem with 10 variables and 200 clauses it was able to find a valid satisfying assignment. Therefore, I pushed it to test with 14 variables and 100 clauses, and it got half correct among 4 instances (See files with prefix formula14_ in here). Half correct sounds like a decent performance, but it is equivalent to random guessing.
，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
网络依赖 — 没有网络就无法提供服务，更多细节参见搜狗输入法下载
長期推廣校園轉型正義的東吳大學教授陳俊宏，則樂見這次爭議帶來的補課潮。他認為，這能讓原本沉默不談的歷史禁忌，轉化成公共認知，對平復集體創傷與強化民主韌性具正向意義。「不過，傷痕要真正平撫，取決於能不能深化理解這段歷史，並轉化爲長期教育與制度工程，而不是只是短暫輿論熱度。」